Category Archives: Pulmonary

DLBCL Associated with Chronic Inflammation

DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation is a special subtype of DLBCL first described in 1987 and subsequently recognized as a specific and separate entity in the 2008 WHO hematopathology classification.

Morphologically, it is recognized as a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that arises in the setting of long-standing chronic inflammation and is associated with EBV infection. Commonly, these present as tumor masses involving body cavities. This is classically and originally described as pleural-based lesions in patients with chronic pyothorax (artificial pneumothorax for pulmonary tuberculosis or tuberculosis pleuritis).

Originally, these were designated as ‘pyothorax-associated lymphomas’ (PAL) and characteristically are associated with EBV.  It is thought that these lesions arise as a result of ‘local’ immunodeficiency, and seem to carry the following common characteristics (regardless of location):

  1. Association with EBV
  2. Confined space (often body cavity)
  3. Long standing/slow growing lesion associated with chronic inflammation
  4. Morphologic characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Immunophenotype

Often, these cases will have extensive necrosis, which may make diagnosis very difficult on small biopsy samples. Additionally, the immunophenotype may vary widely with variable loss and expression of both T and B cell markers.

  • CD20 +
  • CD79a +
  • MUM-1 +
  • CD138 +/-(these cases may be negative for CD20/CD79a)
  • Subset of cases with T-cell marker expression (CD2, CD3, CD4, and/or CD7)
  • EBV (EBER) +
Microscopic images
DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation – Extensive necrosis
DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
Aberrant CD3 expression in DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
Aberrant strong CD7 expression in DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
Strong CD20 expression in DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
Dim subset expression of CD79a in DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation.
Strong diffuse MUM-1 expression in DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
EBER expression (strong/diffuse) in neoplastic cells of DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation.
References

Loong F, Chan ACL, Ho BCS, Chau Y-P, Lee H-Y, Cheuk W, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma associated with chronic inflammation as an incidental finding and new clinical scenarios. Mod Pathol. 2010;23: 493–501. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2009.168


Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris, NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J (Eds):  WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues (Revised 4th edition). IARC: Lyon 2017

ROS-1

ROS-1 rearrangements with at least 12 different partner proteins have been identified in a small subset of lung non-small cell carcinomas (1–2%), which shows susceptibility to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) similar to ALK rearranged tumors.  ROS-1 is considered a oncogene found on chromosome 6.  The exact mechanism of activation of this gene protein product with the various gene rearrangement partners is not understood.  The protein function is similar to that of the ALK family, which is why this mutation was studied for possible response to ALK inhibitors (crizotinib).
 
Recently, ROS-1 mutated tumors have been approved for TKI therapy with identification of a rearrangement by FISH analysis.  Like ALK, ROS-1 FISH utilizes a break apart probe to identify the presence of a gene rearrangement.  Other successful modalities for identification of ROS-1 rearrangements include ‘next generation’ sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry.
 
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been studied as an alternative to FISH as a screening modality.  Based on multiple studies, the sensitivity of IHC appears to be near 100% with the specificity of at least 92%.  These studies were performed using the D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody clone (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts).

Stain Interpretation
Unlike ALK, there is no known normal tissue counterpart which can be used as a control.  Therefore, known ROS-1 positive tumors or cell lines  (HCC78 cell line with the SLC34A2-ROS1 rearrangement) are generally used.  ROS-1 expression is cytoplasmic with described expression ranging from finely granular to globular cytoplasmic staining and membranous staining.  No consensuses has been established as to the minimal threshold of positivity.
 
Possible interpretation pitfalls include weak staining of type II pneumocytes and alveolar macrophages along with osteoclast-type giant cells in bone biopsies.  Like any immunostain, contextual evaluation is critical.

References
Thunnissen E, Allen TC, Adam J, Aisner DL, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, et al. Immunohistochemistry of Pulmonary Biomarkers: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142: 408–419. doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-0106-SA
 
Shaw AT, Ou S-HI, Bang Y-J, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, Salgia R, et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371: 1963–1971. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1406766
 
Bubendorf L, Büttner R, Al-Dayel F, Dietel M, Elmberger G, Kerr K, et al. Testing for ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a review with recommendations. Virchows Arch. 2016;469: 489–503. doi:10.1007/s00428-016-2000-3
 
Boyle TA, Masago K, Ellison KE, Yatabe Y, Hirsch FR (2015) ROS1 immunohistochemistry among major genotypes of non- small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 16(2):106–111. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2014.10.003 
 
CaoB,WeiP,LiuZ,BiR,LuY,ZhangL,ZhangJ,YangY,Shen C, Du X, Zhou X (2016) Detection of lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 rearrangement by IHC, FISH, and RT-PCR and analysis of its clinicopathologic features. Onco Targets Ther 9:131–138. doi:10.2147/OTT.S94997 
 
Sholl LM, Sun H, Butaney M, Zhang C, Lee C, Janne PA, Rodig SJ (2013) ROS1 immunohistochemistry for detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 37(9):14411449. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182960fa7
 
Yoshida A, Tsuta K, Wakai S, Arai Y, Asamura H, Shibata T, Furuta, K, Kohno T, Kushima R (2014) Immunohistochemical detection of ROS1 is useful for identifying ROS1 rearrangements in lung can- cers. Mod Pathol 27(5):711720. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2013.192
 
Rogers TM, Russell PA, Wright G, Wainer Z, Pang JM, Henricksen LA, Singh S, Stanislaw S, Grille J, Roberts E, Solomon B, Fox SB (2015) Comparison of methods in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 10(4):611618. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000465
 
Rimkunas VM, Crosby KE, Li D, Hu Y, Kelly ME, Gu TL, Mack JS, Silver MR, Zhou X, Haack H (2012) Analysis of receptor tyro- sine kinase ROS1-positive tumors in non-small cell lung cancer: identification of a FIG-ROS1 fusion. Clin Cancer Res 18(16): 44494457. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3351
 
Mescam-Mancini L, Lantuejoul S, Moro-Sibilot D, Rouquette I, Souquet PJ, Audigier-Valette C, Sabourin JC, Decroisette C, Sakhri L, Brambilla E, McLeer-Florin A (2014) On the relevance of a testing algorithm for the detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer 83(2):168–173. doi:10.1016/j. lungcan.2013.11.019 
 
Shan L, Lian F, Guo L, Qiu T, Ling Y, Ying J, Lin D (2015) Detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison of IHC, FISH and real-time RT-PCR. PLoS One 10(3): e0120422. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120422 

Mesothelioma vs. Adenocarcinoma

Immunohistochemistry
It is generally recommended to perform two mesothelioma markers and two carcinoma markers, since there is no single sensitive and specific marker for either entity.  The data below is a snapshot of several studies.
 
IHC Marker
Adenocarcinoma
Mesothelioma
8%
100%
CK5/6 (CK5)
2%
100%
0%
93%
Thrombomodulin
14%
61-77%
N-Cadherin
30%
73%
93-100%
8%
80-100%
18%
BG8
96%
7%
81-88%
0%
84%
0%
72-74%
0%
72-85%
0%
 
Obviously the main source of adenocarcinoma in this differential setting is with a primary lung adenocarcinoma and mesothelioma.  If a metastasis is likely, then the stain performance expectations for adenocarinoma may vary significantly (e.g. metastatic ovarian serous carcinoma would likely express WT-1).
References
Marchevsky AM. Application of immunohistochemistry to the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132: 397–401. 
 
Sandeck HP, Røe OD, Kjærheim K, Willén H, Larsson E. Re-evaluation of histological diagnoses of malignant mesothelioma by immunohistochemistry. Diagnostic pathology. 2010;5: 47. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-5-47
 
Ordóñez NG. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129: 1407–1414.